Pengaruh Budaya Organisasi dan Motivasi Kerja Terhadap Kepuasan Kerja serta Implikasinya Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PostprintArtikel ini dimuat di Jurnal Banking & Managemen Review Vol 2 No 1 Mei 2013Penerbit STIE Ekuitas BandungAbstractThe study is titled "The Effect of Organizational Culture and Work Motivation And On The Job Satisfaction on Employee Performance Implications".Research objectives are: 1) to determine and assess the organizational culture, employee motivation, job satisfaction and employee performance, 2) to determine the influence of organizational culture and work motivation partially on employee job satisfaction, and 3) to determine the influence of organizational culture and motivation simultaneously work on employee job satisfaction; 4) to determine the influence of job satisfaction on employee performance.The research was conducted by PT Industri Telekomunikasi Indonesia (Persero), by taking a sample of 190 employees from a population of 625 employees. The method used is descriptive method using path analysis (path analysis), and operate calculation using PASW Statistics 18 software.Results of this study are as follows: 1) organizational culture significantly influence employee job satisfaction, with the magnitude of the effect of 36.5%, 2) work motivation significantly influence employee job satisfaction, with the magnitude of the effect of 39.8%; 3 ) organizational culture and work motivation simultaneously significant effect on employee job satisfaction, with the magnitude of the effect of 76.4%; 4) job satisfaction have a significant effect on the performance of employees, with the magnitude of the effect of 81.1%.The conclusion of this research is proven there is significant relationship between organizational culture and work motivation on job satisfaction as well as implications for the performance of employees at PT Industri Telekomunikasi Indonesia (Persero).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".