MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Orthostatic hypotension is associated with impaired cardiac structure and function after spinal cord injury

2021· article· en· W3168788274 on OpenAlexafffund
Berkeley Scott, Brian Hayes, Malihe‐Sadat Poormasjedi‐Meibod, Mary Fossey, Erin Erskine, Jan Elaine Soriano, Marcus Tso, Ryan E. Rosentreter, Alessandro Satriano, Antoine Dufour, Rebecca Charbonneau, Patricia Feuchter, Sandra Rivest, Jacqueline Flewitt, Julio García, Christopher R. West, James White, Aaron A. Phillips

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
Canadian institutionsLibin Cardiovascular Institute of AlbertaUniversity of British ColumbiaInternational Collaboration On Repair DiscoveriesUniversity of Calgary
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCampus Alberta NeuroscienceNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaHotchkiss Brain Institute
KeywordsMedicineOrthostatic vital signsCardiologySpinal cord injuryInternal medicineBlood pressureCardiac function curveAnesthesiaStroke volumeVentriclePopulationInferior vena cavaHeart rateSpinal cordHeart failure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Heart disease is a primary cause of death after spinal cord injury (SCI). A 20 mmHg or more reduction in systolic blood pressure (BP) when assuming the upright posture is termed orthostatic hypotension (OH). Epidemiological data in the general population established a causal relationship between OH and heart disease. Orthostatic hypotension and heart disease are widespread after SCI however, it is unknown if the severity of OH after SCI is associated with cardiac structure or function and markers of cardiac health. We aimed to understand this relationship combining an interventional rodent study and a cross‐sectional clinical study, using gold standard invasive techniques and cardiac‐optimized magnetic resonance imaging, respectively. We hypothesized that after SCI, OH severity would be associated with reduced cardiac structure and function as well as poorer markers of cardiac health. Twenty‐one wistar rats underwent a complete transection at the T3 spinal segment. One week later, half of these animals were exposed to five one‐minute intervals of simulated OH daily for eight weeks using a custom lower body negative pressure chamber (n=10; Fig. 1A). Nine weeks post‐SCI, invasive pressure‐volume catheterization and inferior vena cava occlusion were performed on both groups. Daily exposure to OH impaired left ventricle (LV) structure and function in rats with SCI as evidenced by reduced stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (Q), and end‐systolic elastance (Ees), along with increased ventricular‐vascular coupling (VVC) and arterial elastance (Ea; Fig. 1B). Guided by these interventional preclinical results, we next cross‐sectionally tested this association in a group of eight individuals with motor‐complete chronic SCI using 3‐Tesla cardiac‐optimized magnetic resonance imaging (Fig. 1C), 24‐hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (Fig. 1D), and orthostatic tilt‐table testing at 60 degrees following clinical guidelines (Fig. 1E). More severe OH was associated with impaired cardiac structure and poorer markers of cardiac health, indicated by increased LV mass, increased left atrial volume, and increased troponin T (Fig. 1F). Our translational research, using both interventional preclinical and cross‐sectional clinical assessments, indicates that OH after SCI is associated with impaired cardiac structure and function as well as poorer markers of cardiac health. The next step is to test if mitigating OH after SCI prevents this decline.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicCardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersFrench-language works237,207