MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Development and validation of a prediction model for kidney failure in long-term survivors of childhood cancer: A report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (CCSS).

2021· article· en· W3168788346 on OpenAlexaff
Natalie Wu, Yan Chen, Bryan V. Dieffenbach, Nan Li, Matthew J. Ehrhardt, Daniel M. Green, Sangeeta Hingorani, Rebecca M. Howell, John L. Jefferies, Daniel A. Mulrooney, Kevin C. Oeffinger, Leslie L. Robison, Brent R. Weil, Yan Yuan, Yutaka Yasui, Melissa M. Hudson, Wendy M. Leisenring, Gregory T. Armstrong, Eric J. Chow

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCohortKidney transplantationKidney diseaseCancerKidney cancerDialysisProportional hazards modelConcordanceInternal medicineTransplantationOncology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

10047 Background: Kidney failure (need for dialysis or kidney transplantation, or death due to kidney disease) is a rare but serious late effect for survivors of childhood cancer. We aimed to develop a model using demographic and treatment characteristics to predict individual risk of kidney failure among five-year survivors of childhood cancer. Methods: CCSS survivors without kidney failure at five years after cancer diagnosis (n = 25,483) were assessed for subsequent kidney failure by age 40. Outcomes were self-reported and corroborated by the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network and the National Death Index. A sibling cohort (n = 5045) served as a comparator. Piecewise exponential models with backward selection estimated the relationships between potential predictors and kidney failure and were converted to integer risk scores. Additional results from the St. Jude Lifetime Cohort Study (SJLIFE, n = 2490) and the National Wilms Tumor Study (NWTS, n = 6760) validated the models. Results: Among CCSS survivors, 204 developed late kidney failure. We developed a model with sex, race/ethnicity, age at cancer diagnosis, nephrectomy, exposure to specific chemotherapy, any abdominal radiation, presence of genitourinary anomalies, and early-onset hypertension (Table). Risk scores achieved an area under the curve (AUC) and concordance (C) statistic of 0.65 and 0.68 for kidney failure by age 40. Validation cohort AUC and C statistics were 0.83/0.86 for SJLIFE (8 cases) and 0.61/0.63 for NWTS (91 cases). An alternative model with specific chemotherapy doses and kidney-specific radiation dosimetry had similar AUC and C statistic (0.67/0.70). Integer risk scores were collapsed to form statistically distinct low (score <3; 87 cases of 17,326), moderate (score 3-5; 63 cases of 4667), and high (score 6+; 18 cases of 401) risk groups. These groups corresponded to cumulative incidences in CCSS of kidney failure by age 40 of 0.6% (95% CI 0.4-0.7%), 2.3% (95% CI 1.6-3.2%), and 9.4% (95% CI 4.4-16.7%), compared with 0.2% (95% CI 0.1-0.5%) among siblings. Conclusions: Using readily available information, we were able to identify low, moderate, and high risk groups for developing kidney failure following treatment for childhood cancer. These prediction models may help guide screening and interventional strategies for higher risk survivors.[Table: see text]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.018
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.022
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.095

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0180.022
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.096
GPT teacher head0.439
Teacher spread0.343 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life→French-language works237,207→