Utilization of Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) to Reconstruct Bilateral Mandibular Defects
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) plus bone substitute matrix used to repair defects in the viscerocranium has been demonstrated to be equally as effective at regenerating bone as autografts. The creation of fewer surgical sites, reduced operative and recovery time, and infection prevention are all potential benefits of this novel approach, especially for patients with conditions that complicate surgical management and recovery. Case presentation: A 33-year-old male with schizophrenia presented with trauma-induced bilateral mandibular fractures. Premorbid mental health factors and a complicated clinical trajectory precluded traditional management using bone autografts to repair mandibular defects and restore occlusive alignment. Instead, a composite matrix consisting of cadaver-derived bone chips and PRP was used to span 1 and 1.5 cm mandibular gaps. No complications were identified and occlusion with adequate alignment and function was achieved. Conclusion: We report the first patient to undergo surgical repair for multiple trauma-induced mandibular bone defects using a matrix made only of bone substitute and PRP.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".