MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3168845503 · doi:10.1209/0295-5075/ac8caf

Time Fisher information associated with fluctuations in quantum geometry

2022· article· en· W3168845503 on OpenAlex
Salman Sajad Wani, James Q. Quach, Mir Faizal

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEurophysics Letters (EPL) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics
Canadian institutionsOkanagan University CollegeUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of LethbridgeCanadian Quantum Research Center
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHamiltonian (control theory)ObservableOperator (biology)Hamiltonian constraintQuantumPhysicsProblem of timeQuantum gravityTheoretical physicsMathematical physicsClassical mechanicsMathematicsQuantum mechanicsLoop quantum gravity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract As time is not an observable, we use Fisher information (FI) to address the problem of time. We demonstrate that although the Hamiltonian operator is the generator of time, the Hamiltonian constraint operator cannot observe the change that arises through the passage of time. This is because the Hamiltonian constraint does not contain time FI. As we also identify an alternative operator on the world-sheet which does contain time FI, we argue that the timelessness of quantum gravity occurs due to the use of an inappropriate operator. We propose that a criterion for a physically meaningful operator in any quantum gravitational process is that it should contain non-vanishing time FI. Although we explicitly derive these results on the world-sheet of bosonic strings, we argue that it holds for any quantum geometry associated with time-reparametrization–invariant classical geometry.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.652
Threshold uncertainty score0.594

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it