Anomalous origin of a coronary artery from the pulmonary artery presenting in adulthood: Experience from a tertiary center
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Anomalous origin of a coronary artery from the pulmonary artery (PA) is a rare condition that usually presents in childhood. The aim of this study is to describe its characteristics in unrepaired adults. We conducted a retrospective study of 18 patients with left and right anomalous coronary artery from the PA (ALCAPA and ARCAPA) diagnosed in adulthood. Patients ≥18 years old at diagnosis and assessed at least once in our institution were included. Median age at diagnosis was 29.5 years [IQR 24.0–48.8]. Presentation mode varied, with two patients (11%) diagnosed following aborted sudden cardiac death. Diagnosis was most frequently made by coronary angiography (44%) and cardiac computed tomography (28%). The mean left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) at presentation was 56 ±10% and moderate or severe mitral regurgitation was present in 5 patients. Surgical or interventional repair was performed in 14 patients (78%), 9 of whom (50%) underwent reimplantation. Median follow-up was 8.5 years [IQR 0.98–13.8]. One patient with severe pulmonary hypertension died during the follow-up. Most patients (79%) were in NYHA functional class 1 at last follow-up with a mean LVEF of 53±12%. Anomalous origin of a coronary artery from the PA can present in adulthood in various ways. Multimodality imaging allows the diagnosis and assessment of functional impact. Surgical correction of ALCAPA with establishment of a dual coronary pathway was the most frequent management strategy in our cohort. The majority of patients experienced favorable long-term outcomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".