MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Serum and glucocorticoid inducible kinase regulates hERG channels through inhibition of Nedd4–2 and activation of Rab11 recycling endosomes

2013· article· en· W3169037029 on OpenAlexaffabout
Shawn M. Lamothe, Shetuan Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordshERGNEDD4SGK1Ubiquitin ligaseUbiquitinChemistryEndosomeCell biologyPhosphorylationIon channelPatch clampPotassium channelBiologyBiochemistryEndocrinologyGeneReceptorIntracellular

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The human ether‐a‐go‐go‐related gene (hERG) encodes the rapidly activating delayed rectifier potassium channel (I Kr ). Loss of function of hERG channels due to mutations or drug‐induced blockage can cause long QT syndrome, leading to ventricular arrhythmias or sudden death. Physical or emotional stress is known to affect ion channel activity. Stress hormones such as cortisol regulate the expression of various genes including the serum‐ and glucocorticoid‐inducible kinase (SGK). Using patch clamp, Western blot, co‐immunoprecipitation, and immunocytochemistry methods, we demonstrate that SGK isoforms SGK1 and SGK3 increased hERG current ( I HERG ) and the expression level of mature hERG proteins. We recently showed that mature hERG channels are degraded by ubiquitin ligase Nedd4–2 via enhanced ubiquitination. We observed that SGK1 and SGK3 overexpression enhanced Nedd4–2 phosphorylation which is known to inhibit Nedd4–2 activity. However, removal of the Nedd4–2 effect on hERG channels by disrupting Nedd4–2 target motif in hERG reduced but did not eliminate the SGK‐induced increase in hERG expression. Additional disruption of Rab11 proteins led to a complete elimination of SGK‐mediated hERG increase. We conclude that SGK isoforms 1 and 3 enhance hERG stability by inhibiting Nedd4–2 ubiquitin ligase and activating Rab11 recycling endosomes. Supported by: Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling→French-language works237,207→