Bibliographic record
Abstract
A number of species of bats modify leaves into tents, which they use as roost-sites. Through this process, some areas of the leaf lamina are damaged or become detached from the midrib. Such injuries do not cause death of the leaf or the detached areas, indicating that water supply to these areas must be maintained. We examined the anatomy of the vascular systems and water transport in the leaves of three species of plants: Heliconia pogonantha L., Manicaria plukenetii Griseb. & H. Wendl., and Cryosophila warcsewiczii (H. Wend.) Bartlett. In altered leaves of all three species, detached areas of the laminae were supplied with water by minor transverse veins branching from the first major parallel vein that remained intact next to the cut. These transverse veins conducted water through single xylem elements of narrow diameter (approximately 10 urn) previously thought to supply water only to mesophyll cells in their immediate vicinity. The short lengths of these veins compensates their high resistance to water flow (a consequence of their small diameter xylem elements), indicating that small transverse veins have a large capacity for water transport. Water typically flowed through transverse veins into detached major and minor parallel veins, filled these parallel veins in both directions (i.e. toward the midrib and the leaf edge), and continued on into subsequent transverse and parallel veins, thereby supplying water to the entire leaf. Water conduction through these small transverse veins could support large areas of leaf lamina, keeping the leaf-tent alive for at least several months. The maintenance of the flow of water and nutrients to areas of leaves detached by bats during the tent-making process increases the longevity and decreases the conspicuousness of leaf-tents, and is likely a key factor in the success of this roosting strategy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".