Flow-induced cross-flow vibrations of long flexible cylinder with an upstream wake interference
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Flow-induced vibration (FIV) of a flexible cylinder with an upstream wake interference at a subcritical Reynolds number is numerically investigated in this study. Two cylinders are installed in a tandem arrangement with the tandem separation between the cylinder centers set at 5.0 diameters. The downstream cylinder is flexible and placed in the wake of the stationary rigid upstream cylinder. A quasi-three-dimensional fluid-structure interaction (FSI) numerical methodology that couples the strip theory-based Lagrangian discrete vortex method with the finite-element method (FEM) for structural dynamics is developed to simulate the FIV response of the flexible cylinder with the upstream wake interference. The vortex-induced vibration (VIV) of an identical isolated cylinder is also numerically simulated as a contrast. This numerical study characterizes the dynamic response of the cylinder FIV with the upstream wake interference and sheds light on the FSI mechanisms responsible for the structural dynamic response. With the upstream wake interference, the cylinder FIV response shows two features distinct from the isolated VIV response: the vibration of large amplitude during the modal resonance branch transition and the extension of the modal resonance branch. The hydrodynamic coefficients database is constructed by the rigid cylinder forced vibration experiment to help explain the FSI properties of the FIV dynamic response. The lower added mass coefficient for the FIV with the upstream wake interference than the VIV of the isolated cylinder guarantees the synchronization between the vortex shedding frequency and the “true” natural frequency of the structure persisting to higher reduced velocity in a certain modal resonance response branch. The excitation coefficient distribution indicates that the cylinder FIV with the upstream wake interference reaches higher amplitude at high reduced velocity, instead of ceasing resonance as the isolated cylinder. The numerical wake visualization is shown and used to explain the correlation between the distribution of hydrodynamic coefficients along the cylinder span and the wake vortex mode. It is found that the upstream wake interference effect is strongly correlated with the vortex–structure interaction pattern between the upstream wake vortices and the downstream motion. When the upstream vortex impinges on the downstream cylinder and splits into subvortices, the effect of the upstream wake interference acting on the downstream cylinder reduces. When the downstream cylinder enters the gap between the upstream vortices over the entire vibration process, the upstream wake has a stronger interference effect on the downstream FIV response.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it