Le corps apprenant et la matérialité des choses : une recherche par le corps sur l’acte de design
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans le contexte de l’ère anthropocène, les préoccupations du design s’élargissent et complexifient son action. Elles repensent de fait les compétences et les connaissances nécessaires aux futurs designers. L’évolution pédagogique du design voit ainsi les approches expérientielles et matérielles de plus en plus présentes en conception, à travers la valorisation des étapes de transformation amenant à l’artefact. Au-delà des moyens et des stratégies pédagogiques mises en place, cet article ambitionne de regarder de plus près ce que le vécu et les modalités du corps qui apprend, dans toutes ses dimensions, peuvent nous dire sur l’acte de design et son enseignement. Cette compréhension par le vivant, en interaction avec son milieu éducatif, convoque sa corporalité, ses processus d’incorporation et de singularisation, en jeu dans le devenir-designer. Une recherche sur le corps qui apprend le design aujourd’hui semble propice pour saisir la réactualisation de la pratique face aux nouveaux enjeux de la culture matérielle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.031 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".