Normal BOLD Response to a Step CO2 Stimulus After Correction for Partial Volume Averaging
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) is defined as the change in cerebral blood flow induced by a change in a vasoactive stimulus. CVR using BOLD MRI in combination with changes in end-tidal CO 2 is a very useful method for assessing vascular performance. In recent years, this technique has benefited from an advanced gas delivery method where end-tidal CO 2 can be targeted, measured very precisely, and validated against arterial blood gas sampling ( Ito et al., 2008 ). This has enabled more precise comparison of an individual patient against a normative atlas of healthy subjects. However, expected control ranges for CVR metrics have not been reported in the literature. In this work, we calculate and report the range of control values for the magnitude (mCVR), the steady state amplitude (ssCVR), and the speed (TAU) of the BOLD response to a standard step stimulus, as well as the time delay (TD) as observed in a cohort of 45 healthy controls. These CVR metrics maps were corrected for partial volume averaging for brain tissue types using a linear regression method to enable more accurate quantitation of CVR metrics. In brief, this method uses adjacent voxel CVR metrics in combination with their tissue composition to write the corresponding set of linear equations for estimating CVR metrics of gray matter (GM), white matter (WM), and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). After partial volume correction, mCVR and ssCVR increase as expected in gray matter, respectively, by 25 and 19%, and decrease as expected in white matter by 33 and 13%. In contrast, TAU and TD decrease in gray matter by 33 and 13%. TAU increase in white matter by 24%, but TD surprisingly decreased by 9%. This correction enables more accurate voxel-wise tissue composition providing greater precision when reporting gray and white matter CVR values.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".