MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Early life lead exposure and behavioral problems among children in the HOME Study

2020· article· en· W3169548834 on OpenAlexaff
Clara G. Sears, Bruce P. Lanphear, David E. Jacobs, Sherry Dixon, Jonathan Wilson, Yingying Xu, A. Chen, Kimberly Yolton, Joseph M. Braun

Bibliographic record

VenueISEE Conference Abstracts · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHeavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLead exposureBlood lead levelGeneralized estimating equationMedicineLead (geology)Lead poisoningDemographyConfidence intervalPediatricsInternal medicineBiologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Lead exposure is associated with behavioral problems in children, but the ages when children are most susceptible to lead toxicity are unclear. Our objective was to evaluate the association of repeated blood lead concentrations with parent-reported behaviors and identify periods of heightened susceptibility.Methods: Between 2003-2006, we recruited pregnant women (n=389) living in homes built pre-1978 from Cincinnati, Ohio (HOME Study) and followed their children until age 8 years. We quantified lead in whole blood samples collected from children at ages 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 8 years. We assessed parent-reported child behavior using the Behavioral Assessment System for Children-2 (BASC-2) when children were ages 2, 3, 4, 5, and 8 years. Using linear regression with generalized estimating equations adjusted for covariates, we estimated associations of time-varying blood lead concentrations (ln-transformed, g/L) with behavioral profiles using the BASC-2 composite scales. We used multiple informant models to assess heterogeneity in these associations across exposure periods (n=241).Results: The median blood lead concentration peaked at 15 g/L around age 2 years (25th, 75th=10, 22 g/L) and gradually decreased to 6 g/L around age 8 years (25th, 75th=4, 9) g/L). Higher time-varying blood lead concentrations were associated with more externalizing problems (β:1.8-point; 95% CI= 0.3, 3.2). The association between blood lead levels and externalizing problems varied by exposure timing (lead x period interaction p-value=0.11), with heightened susceptibility around ages 3 (β:2.1-point; 95% CI= 0.6, 3.6) and 8 (β:3.5-point; 95% CI= 1.2, 5.7) years compared with other ages. Conclusion: Children with higher blood lead levels had more parent-reported hyperactive and aggressive behaviors. Future research could investigate if the periods of heightened susceptibility around ages 3 and 8 years are due to unique neurodevelopmental processes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.086

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueISEE Conference AbstractsSame topicHeavy Metal Exposure and ToxicityFrench-language works237,207