MO286DESIGN OF A PH1, MULTICENTER TRIAL TO INVESTIGATE THE SAFETY, TOLERABILITY, PK/PD OF BION-1301 IN HEALTHY VOLUNTEERS AND ADULTS WITH IGAN AND A MULTICENTER, OPEN-LABEL EXTENSION STUDY FOR IGAN PATIENTS WHO PARTICIPATED IN A PRIOR TRIAL OF BION-1301
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background and Aims IgA nephropathy (IgAN), the leading cause of primary glomerulonephritis, is an autoimmune disease with no approved treatments.1 Progression to end-stage-renal disease occurs in up to 45% of IgAN patients, requiring dialysis or kidney transplant to manage.2-4 A critical step in IgAN pathogenesis is the production of galactose-deficient IgA1 (Gd-IgA1) leading to the generation of anti-Gd-IgA autoantibodies and the formation of immune complexes that result in kidney inflammation and damage.5 A Proliferation-Inducing Ligand (APRIL), a soluble factor that regulates B cell differentiation, proliferation and survival of plasma cells, and IgA class-switching is elevated in patients with IgAN6, 7. IgAN patients with high plasma APRIL levels are reported as having higher levels of Gd-IgA1 and proteinuria and lower estimated glomerular filtration rates compared to those with lower plasma APRIL levels.7 BION-1301 is a novel humanized blocking antibody targeting APRIL. The primary objective of Study ADU-CL-19 is to assess the short-term safety and tolerability of BION-1301 in Healthy Volunteers (HV) and IgAN patients and to secondarily assess the short-term pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), immunogenicity, and preliminary clinical activity of BION-1301. The primary objective of Study ADU-CL-24 is to characterize the long-term safety of BION-1301 in IgAN patients who completed treatment in ADU-CL-19 while secondarily assessing the long-term PK, PD, immunogenicity, and preliminary clinical activity of BION-1301. Method The Phase 1 study (ADU-CL-19; NCT03945318) comprises 3 parts. Parts 1 and 2 are double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled single and multiple ascending dose designs in HV; both parts have been completed. Part 3 is an ongoing multicenter (US and UK), multiple-dose, two cohort design in approximately 20 patients with IgAN (10/cohort). Key eligibility criteria for Part 3 includes: (1) urine protein ≥0.5 g/24h or baseline UPCR ≥0.5 g/g, (2) stable/optimized dose of ACE-I/ARB or intolerant to ACE-I/ARB, and (3) biopsy-verified diagnosis of IgAN within the past 10 years. In Part 3, patients in Cohort 1 are receiving BION-1301 at 450mg every 2 weeks for 3 months. The dose and schedule for Cohort 2 will be determined by the Safety Review Team (SRT) based on data from the first 5 patients. After 3 months of treatment, patients continue safety follow-up for approximately 6 months unless deciding to enroll in the open-label extension (OLE) study, withdraw from the study, or are lost to follow up. Study ADU-CL-24 (NCT04684745) is a Phase 2 Open-Label Extension (OLE) of Study ADU-CL-19. Eligibility for the OLE study is restricted to those patients who completed at least 75% of their intended doses as well as the End of Treatment (EOT) visit in Study ADU-CL-19. Patients who enroll directly from the ADU-CL-19 EOT visit are not required to attend an additional screening visit. This is encouraged to maintain un-interrupted dosing. Once enrolled in the OLE, patients receive BION-1301 at the same dose and regimen as assigned in the parent study for up to 2 years. The dose, route, and regimen of BION-1301 may change after review of emergent safety, PK, PD and efficacy data by the SRT. Results Parts 1 and 2 of the Phase 1 study in HV are complete and the data were presented at ASN in 20208 Part 3 of the Phase 1 and the Phase 2 OLE study are ongoing, and interim results from the first dose cohort in IgAN patients are being presented in a separate poster at this meeting. Conclusion The design of the Phase 1 and Phase 2 OLE studies described in HVs and IgAN patients have enabled the generation of short- and long-term safety, PK, PD, immunogenicity and preliminary efficacy data for BION-1301. The Phase 1 short-term data will guide the design of future later-stage trials of BION-1301, while the long-term data from OLE will enable a greater understanding of the potential long-term risk/benefit profile of BION-1301 in IgAN patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".