MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3169813288 · doi:10.1109/tns.2021.3084446

FPGA Implementation of an NCO Based CDR for the JUNO Front-End Electronics

2021· article· en· W3169813288 on OpenAlexaff
F. Marini, M. Bellato, Antonio Bergnoli, R. Brugnera, F. Dal Corso, Daniele Corti, J. Dong, A. Garfagnini, A. Giaz, G. Gong, J. F. Hu, R. Isocrate, Xiaoshan Jiang, I. Lippi, K. von Sturm, S. Aiello, Giuseppe Andronico, V. Antonelli, W. Bandini, D. Basilico, A. Brigatti, Andrea Barresi, A. Budano, Riccardo Bruno, B. Caccianiga, Antonio Cammi, R. Caruso, D. Chiesa, Catia Clementi, S. Costa, Xuefeng Ding, S. Dusini, Andrea Fabbri, Marco Fargetta, R. Ford, A. Formozov, M. Giammarchi, M. Grassi, Cecilia Landini, P. Lombardi, Claudio Lombardo, Fabio Mantovani, S. M. Mari, C. Martellini, A. Martini, Emanuela Meroni, M. Mezzetto, L. Miramonti, P. Montini, M. Montuschi, M. Nastasi, F. Ortica, A. Paoloni, S. Parmeggiano, N. Pelliccia, E. Previtali, G. Ranucci, D. Riondino, A. Re, Bernardo Ricci, A. Romani, P. Saggese, Andrea Serafini, C. Sirignano, M. Sisti, L. Stančo, Virginia Strati, Marco Danilo Claudio Torri, C. Tuvé, G. Verde, L. Votano

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNeutrino Physics Research
Canadian institutionsSnolab
FundersInstituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare
KeywordsField-programmable gate arrayClock domain crossingFirmwareDigital clock managerMaster clockElectrical engineeringElectronicsFront and back endsClock signalDigital clockDigital electronicsElectromagnetic interferenceSynchronous circuitElectronic engineeringComputer hardwareComputer scienceJitterEngineeringElectronic circuit

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article describes a design of an field-programmable gate array (FPGA) implementation of a clock and data recovery (CDR) system. The core will be integrated in the FPGA configuration for the front-end electronics (FEE) board of the Jiangmen underground neutrino observatory (JUNO) experiment. The front-end will be placed on the main detector, underground and underwater, making the electronics not accessible after installation. The timing and trigger system relies on a synchronous link connection over CAT5e cable (up to 100 m long) between the front-end and the back-end electronics (BEE), where a twisted-pair is dedicated to clock-forwarding. The robustness of the recovery clock system is essential for the stability of the FPGA firmware. The proposed project is intended to improve the clock recovery operation by increasing the immunity of the link to sudden electromagnetic interference (EMI). On top of this, the core allows to free a twisted-pair in the link, since the clock can be recovered from the data and there is no more need for a clock-dedicated transmission. This will optimize the link granting the possibility to implement other features. The design is based on two components: a numerically-controlled oscillator (NCO), in order to create a controlled frequency clock signal, and a digital phase detector (PD) to match the clock frequency with the data rate. NCOs are often coupled with a digital-to-analog converter (DAC) to create direct digital synthesizers (DDSs), which are able to produce analog waveforms of any desired frequency. In the presented case instead, the NCO generates a digital clock signal of an arbitrary frequency, while the PD manages this frequency by intercepting any shifting on the relative phase between the clock and the data. A phase aligner (PA) module guarantees that data are sampled in the middle of the eye pattern, which represents the optimal sampling point. The article presents an overview of the NCO-based CDR design and implementation, together with some tests and results in order to verify the CDR reliability. Moreover, in the last section, some other possible applications of the core are illustrated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.641
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Nuclear ScienceSame topicNeutrino Physics ResearchFrench-language works237,207