Surfactant-free synthesis of CdS nanorods for efficient reduction of carcinogenic Cr(VI)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hexavalent chromium, Cr(VI), is a toxic, mutagenic and carcinogenic species. We report here the semiconductor-based, photocatalytic reduction of Cr(VI) to trivalent chromium, Cr(III), using CdS nanorods (NRs) as the photocatalyst under visible light illumination. The CdS NRs were synthesized by a facile and scalable solvothermal method in which ethylenediamine acts as solvent and morphology controller. The CdS NRs produced were studied by PXRD, Raman, FESEM, EDX, XPS, PL, UV-visible DRS and BET techniques in order to investigate their structural, morphological and optical properties, as well as their porosity. The photoreduction of Cr(VI) to Cr(III) under visible light illumination was performed under a variety of conditions, i.e., varying the irradiation time, pH, substrate concentration, and the amount of photocatalyst. The maximum photoreduction of Cr(VI) to Cr(III) (99%) was achieved using 60 min of irradiation under acidic conditions (pH 4). The excellent photoreduction ability of the CdS NRs can be attributed to their rod-like structure together with their small particle size, large surface area, and clean surfaces. These properties enhanced separation of the photo-generated electron-hole pairs, which was confirmed by the XRD, BET, and PL measurements. In addition, the results of a kinetic study indicated that the photoreduction of Cr(VI) to Cr(III) follows a pseudo-first-order kinetic model. A possible mechanism for the photocatalytic reduction of Cr(VI) to Cr(III) is also proposed in this paper.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".