MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Cardioprotective Effects of Angiotensin 1‐7 in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF)

2021· article· en· W3170057959 on OpenAlexaff
Pariya Edalat, Karina Pereira Gomes, Noura Ballasy, Anshul S. Jadli, Darrell D. Belke, Vaibhav B. Patel

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHeart Failure Treatment and Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeart failure with preserved ejection fractionCardiologyInternal medicineHeart failureEjection fractionMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a global public‐health epidemic which accounts for half of the heart failure cases. Various therapeutic approaches have been tested to block the activation of Renin Angiotensin System (RAS), including AT1R blockers (ARBs), Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor (ACEi), and direct renin inhibitors (DRIs) with modest to negligible benefits. Discovery of ACE2, a novel homolog of ACE, has advanced our understanding of the RAS. ACE2 is a monocarboxypeptidase which degrades Ang II into Ang 1‐7, which works via the activation of Mas receptor. We have previously shown the critical role of Ang 1‐7/MasR signaling as a negative regulator of the Ang II/AT1R signaling. It has been well understood that the actions of Ang 1‐7 results in the production of nitric oxide (NO) through MAS1, where the imbalance in the level of NO is known to be involved in the development of HEpEF. Objective To determine the therapeutic role of Ang 1‐7 in HFpEF and identify the molecular mechanism related to its action. Methods and results To generate a murine model of HFpEF, male WT mice were subjected to HFD in addition to eNOS inhibition with L‐NAME (0.5 g l‐1 in drinking water) as described by Schiattarella and Hill et al. The murine model of HFpEF was validated using the non‐invasive transthoracic echocardiography and invasive pressure‐volume (PV) loop analyses, which exhibited diastolic dysfunction as well as cardiac hypertrophy. To evaluate the effects of Ang 1‐7 on HFpEF, animals were administered with either saline or Ang 1‐7 (24 ug/kg/day) for the duration of four weeks. Ang 1‐7 decreased the development of diastolic dysfunction induced by HFD + L‐NAME. Series of histological and functional analysis indicated that the HFpEF was primarily due to cardiac metabolic dysfunction. Molecular analyses using Western blotting, showed an increased expression of STAT3 in HFpEF group, which was reduced after 4 weeks of Ang 1‐7 administration. Furthermore, AMPK expression was significantly decreased in HFpEF group, which was improved after 4 weeks of Ang 1‐7 treatment. Conclusion Ang 1‐7 treatment attenuated the development of HFD + L‐NAME‐induced HFpEF, reduced cardiac hypertrophy, and improved metabolic function.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicHeart Failure Treatment and ManagementFrench-language works237,207