MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Effects of residential PM2.5 exposures from indoor and outdoor sources on blood pressure and respiratory inflammation in rural and urban Beijing

2020· article· en· W3170078003 on OpenAlex
H. ZHANG, Yunfei Fan, Yiqun Han, Liu Yan, W. Chen, Yutong Cai, Queenie Chan, Tong Zhu, Frank J. Kelly, Benjamin Barratt

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueISEE Conference Abstracts · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAir Quality and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterquartile rangeExhaled nitric oxideMedicineConfidence intervalBlood pressureBeijingQuartileEnvironmental healthAnimal scienceSystemic inflammationInternal medicineInflammationBiologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Arising from different activities, indoor-generated (PM2.5_ig) and outdoor-generated residential PM2.5 (PM2.5_og) may have different toxicities and health effects. We aimed to evaluate the effects of PM2.5_ig and PM2.5_og on systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and respiratory inflammation (represented by exhaled Nitric Oxide (eNO)).Methods 72 subjects participated in the residential monitoring of PM2.5 in urban and rural Beijing during winter 2016 and summer 2017. In total, valid data were captured for 450 measurement days (approx. 3 days per participant per season). Within the same week of exposure monitoring, BP and eNO from participants were measured two times. A classifying algorithm was developed to isolate PM2.5_ig and PM2.5_og from residential and ambient measurements. Linear mixed-effects model was used to examine the associations between residential exposure and health outcomes.Results For all measurements except PM2.5_og (PM2.5_ig, eNO, SBP and DBP), significant differences were observed between rural and urban participants during the two seasons. For all measurements (PM2.5_ig, PM2.5_og, eNO, SBP and DBP), significant differences were observed between seasons in both sites. Overall, an interquartile range (IQR) increase (22.0 ug/m3) in lag 1-day exposure to PM2.5_og was associated with an elevation in SBP by 1.70% (confidence interval [CI]: 0.47%, 2.95%) and eNO by 15.44% (CI: 6.60%, 25.02%); an IQR increase (5.8 ug/m3) in lag 2-day exposure to PM2.5_ig was associated with an elevation in SBP by 1.12% (CI: 0.26%, 2.00%) and an increased DBP by 1.26% (CI: 0.39%, 2.14%). However, PM2.5_ig were negligible (<0.5 ug/m3) in 44% and 54% of measurement days during winter 2016 and summer 2017, which affected the output from the linear mixed-effects model.Conclusion PM2.5_og and PM2.5_ig demonstrated different lag effects and effect sizes in the assessed health metrics. Full investigation with alternative modelling techniques is ongoing to evaluate the relationship in more detail.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.336
Threshold uncertainty score0.553

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it