Homozygous <scp> <i>WNT9B</i> </scp> variants in two families with bilateral renal agenesis/hypoplasia/dysplasia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract WNT9B plays a key role in the development of the mammalian urogenital system. It is essential for the induction of mesonephric and metanephric tubules, the regulation of renal tubule morphogenesis, and the regulation of renal progenitor cell expansion and differentiation. To our knowledge, WNT9B has not been associated with renal defects in humans; however, WNT9B −/− mice have renal agenesis/hypoplasia and reproductive tract abnormalities. We report four individuals from two unrelated consanguineous families with bilateral renal agenesis/hypoplasia/dysplasia and homozygous variants in WNT9B . The proband from Family 1 has bilateral renal cystic dysplasia and chronic kidney disease. He has two deceased siblings who presented with bilateral renal hypoplasia/agenesis. The three affected family members were homozygous for a missense variant in WNT9B (NM_003396.2: c.949G>A/p.(Gly317Arg)). The proband from Family 2 has renal hypoplasia/dysplasia, chronic kidney disease, and is homozygous for a nonsense variant in WNT9B (NM_003396.2: c.11dupC/p.(Pro5Alafs*52)). Two of her siblings died in the neonatal period, one confirmed to be in the context of oligohydramnios. The proband's unaffected brother is also homozygous for the nonsense variant in WNT9B , suggesting nonpenetrance. We propose a novel association of WNT9B and renal anomalies in humans. Further study is needed to delineate the contribution of WNT9B to genitourinary anomalies in humans.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".