Origin of black glume color in <i>Triticum aestivum</i> lines with introgressions from wheat wild relatives
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dark glume color in Triticinae is a much-studied morphological character. However, pigments that cause the color, the molecular basis of their biosynthesis, and mechanisms of its regulation are still unknown. Dark glume is a common trait in Triticum aestivum lines with alien introgressions. To elucidate the molecular basis of this character, we analyzed the total phenolic content (TPC) in the dark glumed introgression lines (ILs) and their parents. TPC in the dark ILs was found to be higher than their parents and light-glumed lines. All the genotypes were screened for the expression of eight genes encoding the flavonoid biosynthesis pathway enzymes. Expression of three flavonoid genes in the pathway was changed in the introgression lines as compared with their parents. The expression of F3′H and FNS was absent in the lines with introgressions from Aegilops spp. The expression of three genes, F3′H, FLS, and FNS, was found to be altered in the light glumed lines with introgressions from Amblyopyrum muticum. No expression of F3′H was detected in the T. aestivum/Am. muticum lines with light and dark plants, and the other genes of the pathway were found to be expressed at the parental levels. No correlation between the expression profiles and the phenotype was found in the T. aestivum/Am. muticum lines indicating other undetected changes in these lines.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".