An Interpretable Deep Learning Model for Covid-19 Detection With Chest <i>X</i>-Ray Images
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Timely and accurate detection of an epidemic/pandemic is always desired to prevent its spread. For the detection of any disease, there can be more than one approach including deep learning models. However, transparency/interpretability of the reasoning process of a deep learning model related to health science is a necessity. Thus, we introduce an interpretable deep learning model: Gen-ProtoPNet. Gen-ProtoPNet is closely related to two interpretable deep learning models: ProtoPNet and NP-ProtoPNet The latter two models use prototypes of spacial dimension [Formula: see text] and the distance function [Formula: see text]. In our model, we use a generalized version of the distance function [Formula: see text] that enables us to use prototypes of any type of spacial dimensions, that is, square spacial dimensions and rectangular spacial dimensions to classify an input image. The accuracy and precision that our model receives is on par with the best performing non-interpretable deep learning models when we tested the models on the dataset of [Formula: see text]-ray images. Our model attains the highest accuracy of 87.27% on classification of three classes of images, that is close to the accuracy of 88.42% attained by a non-interpretable model on the classification of the given dataset.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".