MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3170289775 · doi:10.1002/ar.24694

Intraskeletal consistency in patterns of vascularity within bat limb bones

2021· article· en· W3170289775 on OpenAlexafffund
Janna M. Andronowski, Mary E. Cole, Tobin L. Hieronymus, Reed A. Davis, Logan R. Usher, Lisa Noelle Cooper

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Anatomical Record · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBat Biology and Ecology Studies
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersNational Research Council CanadaNational Institute of JusticeWestern Economic Diversification CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMemorial University of NewfoundlandUniversity of SaskatchewanCanadian Light Source
KeywordsVascularityAnatomyBiologyPostcraniaSauropodaTaxonPaleontologyMedicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bats are the only mammals to have achieved powered flight. A key innovation allowing for bats to conquer the skies was a forelimb modified into a flexible wing. The wing bones of bats are exceptionally long and dynamically bend with wingbeats. Bone microarchitectural features supporting these novel performance attributes are still largely unknown. The humeri and femora of bats are typically avascular, except for large-bodied taxa (e.g., pteropodid flying foxes). No thorough investigation of vascular canal regionalization and morphology has been undertaken as historically it has been difficult to reconstruct the 3D architecture of these canals. This study augments our understanding of the vascular networks supporting the bone matrix of a sample of bats (n = 24) of variable body mass, representing three families (Pteropodidae [large-bodied, species = 6], Phyllostomidae [medium-bodied, species = 2], and Molossidae [medium-bodied, species = 1]). We employed Synchrotron Radiation-based micro-Computed Tomography (SRμCT) to allow for a detailed comparison of canal morphology within humeri and femora. Results indicate that across selected bats, canal number per unit volume is similar independent of body size. Differences in canal morphometry based on body size and bone type appear primarily related to a broader distribution of the canal network as cortical volume increases. Heavier bats display a relatively rich vascular network of mostly longitudinally-oriented canals that are localized mainly to the mid-cortical and endosteal bone envelopes. Taken together, our results suggest that relative vascularity of the limb bones of heavier bats forms support for nutrient exchange in a regional pattern.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Anatomical RecordSame topicBat Biology and Ecology StudiesFrench-language works237,207