MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Comparative analysis of the parasphenoid bone development in Mexican tetra ( <i>Astyanax mexicanus)</i>

2021· article· en· W3170339605 on OpenAlexaff
Nuwanthika Gimhani, Devi Atukorallaya

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSubterranean biodiversity and taxonomy
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeurocraniumAnatomyVomerBiologyPectoral girdlePopulationSkullMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Astyanax mexicanus is a teleost fish that belongs to the order Characiform. Ithas two distinct eye morphs as surface‐dwelling, pigmented eyed surface fish population, and an eyeless cavefish population. Accumulation of functional mutations in the genes which are important for eye development led to the loss of eyes in cavefish. Some cranial changes have occurred from the direct effect of eye loss in cavefish including size and position of the circumorbital bones, ossified sclera, and the shape of both suborbital 3 and the supraorbital bone. The maxillary teeth, the positions of suborbital 4 to suborbital 6, and the shape of the opercular bone were found to be unaffected by the eye loss. Unlike higher vertebrates, the teleost eyeball does not cover by a bony socket and it has direct communication with the inner neurocranium. However, the influence of eye development on the inner neurocranial bones has gained little attention in research. In A. mexicanus palate bones are mainly made of a series of bones such as parasphenoid bone, basioccipital, vomer, and ethmoid. Among them, parasphenoid bone makes the largest part of the palate. This study was designed to understand the effect of eye loss in cavefish on parasphenoid bone development, shape determination, and bone remodeling activity. A. mexicanus populations; Surface fish and Pachon cavefish at 5dpf, 10 dpf, 20 dpf, 35 dpf, and 60 dpf subjected to alizarin red bone staining. Adult surface fish and two cave populations Pachon and Tinaja cavefish were subjected to micro‐CT imaging and morphometric analysis was carried out using those images to compare the parasphenoid bone anatomy amongst these three morphs. TRAP and ALP staining were used to determine the bone remodeling activity in 60 dpf, A. mexicanus populations of surface and Pachon cavefish. A. mexicanus cavefish and surface are similar to each other in bone development, articulation, and ossification with certain exceptions such as late protrusion of lateral wings in cavefish. The straightened parasphenoid bone observed in cavefish and curved parasphenoid bone observed in surface fish beneath the eye orbit. Bone remodeling activity in cavefish was found to be increased compared to the surface fish. Cavefish have a direct or indirect effect on eye loss on the development of bones in the cranial region. Differential bone remodeling activity observed in cave and surface fish may result from the limited resources in the cave environment and as a long‐term adaptation into troglomorphic cave environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicSubterranean biodiversity and taxonomy→French-language works237,207→