MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3170345171 · doi:10.30525/2661-5169/2021-1-10

INFLUENCE OF ECONOMIC SPACE IMBALANCES ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE ENTERPRISE FINANCIAL MECHANISM

2021· article· en· W3170345171 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lidiia Fedoryshyna, Nataliia Vilchynska

Bibliographic record

VenueGreen Blue and Digital Economy Journal · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgriculture Market Analysis Ukraine
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBalance of paymentsBalance (ability)PaymentQuarter (Canadian coin)BusinessSpace (punctuation)EconomicsFinanceCashMonetary economics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this article is to analyse the nature of imbalances in the economic space, as the problem of impact on the functioning of the financial mechanism of the enterprise is especially relevant for Ukraine, because the results of the domestic financial sector are unbalanced. At the same time, a significant impact is reflected in the functioning of the financial mechanism of the enterprise, expanding its functional load. The instability of economic conditions in Ukraine significantly affects the financial and economic activities of economic entities, which causes non-fulfilment of their planned tasks for the development of their own business. To ensure the successful operation, enterprises must assess the imbalances of the economic space, which are precursors to the development of crisis processes that can have a devastating effect. Methodology. In the course of the research it has been found that the financial mechanism of the enterprise is subject to influence both at the level of the enterprise itself and at the level of economic space. It is determined that the main source of information on the imbalance of the economic space is the balance of payments. Balance of payments is the ratio between the amount of cash received by the country from abroad and the amount of payments abroad during a certain period (year, quarter, month). The main component of the balance of payments is the current account, and the most important item is the balance of goods (trade balance). Its condition determines the state of the balance of payments as a whole, and its dynamics demonstrates the effectiveness of macroeconomic policy. The positive balance of trade indicates an increase in demand for goods and services of the country. The negative balance indicates the low competitiveness of the country’s goods abroad. In the case when the value of exports exceeds the value of imports, a trade surplus is formed. If the value of imports exceeds the value of exports, then there is a trade deficit. The financial account of the balance of payments reflects the sale and repayment of financial claims of one country to another. All financial transactions are classified into three groups: direct investment, portfolio investment, and other investments. The dynamics of the financial account during the study period is negative. This indicator was affected by the crisis in the economy, as well as imperfect legislative support for foreign investors in Ukraine. Results. Theoretical information and structure of the balance of payments are presented, balance of payments articles are analysed, the dynamics of the balance of payments of Ukraine is outlined. The main feature of 2015-2019 is the strengthening of globalization. The intensification of relations between the countries leads to a stronger integration of the whole economy, which in turn creates additional risks associated with the transmission of possible crises in the chain. Value/originality. It is established that the functioning of the financial mechanism of the enterprise is considered under the influence of many factors of the system, in particular economic space. The generation of these imbalances leads to an increase in the vulnerability of the financial mechanism, violating the stability, which is manifested in the inability to resist changes in the situation. By assessing the imbalances of the economic space on the basis of macroeconomic and monetary indicators obtained during the monitoring, economic entities will be able to counteract shocks in the event of a change in the situation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.162
Teacher spread0.157 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGreen Blue and Digital Economy JournalSame topicAgriculture Market Analysis UkraineFrench-language works237,207