Bidirectional associations between cannabis, e-cigarette, and cigarette use among Canadian youth: findings from the COMPASS Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Substance use behaviours have been found to cluster in youth, and cannabis use has been previously linked to tobacco and e-cigarette use. The objective of the current study was to examine the bidirectional associations between cannabis, e-cigarette, and cigarette use among a large sample of Canadian secondary school students. A sample of students in grades 9–11 (n = 14,652) from Ontario and Alberta, Canada who participated in two waves of the COMPASS Study (Time 1 (T1): 2015–2016; Time 2 (T2): 2016–2017) was identified. Autoregressive cross-lagged models investigated the stability of product use between T1 and T2, as well as the bidirectional associations between current cannabis, e-cigarette, and cigarette use while controlling for demographic covariates. Significant autoregressive and bidirectional associations between all three substances were observed. Students who reported using cigarettes and e-cigarettes at T1 were more likely to report using cannabis at T2. Similarly, students who reported using cannabis at T1 were more likely to report using cigarettes and e-cigarettes at T2. Given the bidirectional associations identified between cannabis, e-cigarette, and cigarette use in this research, continued monitoring of evolving policies related to cannabis and e-cigarette use in Canada is needed. Additionally, school and community-based prevention efforts targeting youth should consider addressing poly-substance use.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".