MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3170411500 · doi:10.1101/2021.06.11.448022

Prediction and Characterization of Disorder-Order Transition Regions in Proteins by Deep Learning

2021· preprint· en· W3170411500 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Ziang Yan, Satoshi Omori, Kazunori Yamada, Hafumi Nishi, Kengo Kinoshita

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtein Structure and Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitute of GeneticsJapan Agency for Medical Research and Development
KeywordsFolding (DSP implementation)GRASPArtificial intelligenceIntrinsically disordered proteinsComputer scienceMachine learningChemistryEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The biological functions of proteins are traditionally thought to depend on well-defined three-dimensional structures, but many experimental studies have shown that disordered regions lacking fixed three-dimensional structures also have crucial biological roles. In some of these regions, disorder–order transitions are also involved in various biological processes, such as protein-protein interaction and ligand binding. Therefore, it is crucial to study disordered regions and structural transitions for further understanding of protein functions and folding. Owing to the costs and time requirements of experimental identification of natively disordered or transitional regions, the development of effective computational methods is a key research goal. In this study, we used overall residue dependencies and deep representation learning for prediction and reused the obtained disordered regions for the prediction of disorder–order transitions. Two similar and related prediction tasks were combined. Firstly, we developed a novel deep learning method, Res-BiLstm, for residue-wise disordered region prediction. Our method outperformed other predictors with respect to almost all criteria, as evaluated using an independent test set. For disorder-order transition prediction, we proposed a transfer learning method, Res-BiLstm-NN, with an acceptable but unbalanced performance, yielding reasonable results. To grasp underlining biophysical principles of disorder-order transitions, we performed qualitative analyses on the obtained results and discovered that most transitions have strong disordered or ordered preferences, and more transitions are consistent with the ordered state than the disordered state, different from conventional wisdom. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first sizable-scale study of transition prediction. Availability https://github.com/Yanzziang/Transition_Disorder_Prediction Contact kengo@ecei.tohoku.ac.jp

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicProtein Structure and DynamicsFrench-language works237,207