A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY OF FEMORAL FRACTURES IN WILD BIRDS OF PREY: 119 CASES
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A retrospective study was performed to describe patient and fracture characteristics, treatments, complications, and outcomes associated with femoral fractures in free-ranging birds of prey. Cases were identified from the electronic database and included raptors admitted with femoral fractures at the Bird of Prey Clinic of the Université de Montréal, from 1986 to 2018. In total, 119 individuals from 24 species, with 123 femoral fractures, were included in the study. Twenty-seven birds (23%) were declared dead upon arrival. Ninety-two birds (77%) were admitted alive; 80 with acute fractures and 12 with a fracture that had already healed. A conservative treatment (cage rest) was used to manage eight fractures. Surgical repair was attempted on 34 femoral fractures in 33 birds. An intramedullary pin alone was used in 28 cases (82%), and an external skeletal fixator-intramedullary pin tie-in fixator was used in 6 cases (18%). For surgically treated fractures, 19 healed (in 18 birds), 4 did not heal, and 11 birds died or were euthanized before healing could be achieved. Of the 23/34 fractures where the healing process could be assessed, healing rate for comminuted fractures (11/23) was 91% (10/11). Surgical complications occurred in 10 cases (including 7 cases of migration and loosening of the pin, and 1 case of osteomyelitis), leading to euthanasia in 4 cases. Out of the 21 birds with acute femoral fracture upon presentation that were released, 14 had received a surgical treatment and 7 had received a conservative treatment. Nine of the 21 released birds (43%) had at least one other fractured bone. The majority of deaths and euthanasia occurred within 2 wk after admission (51/59; 86%). Thirteen birds were euthanized primarily because of their femoral fracture. Thirteen birds died in treatment and 33 were deemed nonreleasable and euthanized because of a comorbidity not related to the femoral fracture.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".