A cross‐standardized flow cytometry platform to assess phenotypic stability in precursor B‐cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B‐ALL) xenografts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the continued poor outcome of relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), new patient-specific approaches for disease progression monitoring and therapeutic intervention are urgently needed. Patient-derived xenografts (PDX) of primary ALL in immune-deficient mice have become a powerful tool for studying leukemia biology and therapy response. In PDX mice, the immunophenotype of the patient's leukemia is commonly believed to be stably propagated. In patients, however, the surface marker expression profile of the leukemic population often displays poorly understood immunophenotypic shifts during chemotherapy and ALL progression. We therefore developed a translational flow cytometry platform to study whether the patient-specific immunophenotype is faithfully recapitulated in PDX mice. To enable valid assessment of immunophenotypic stability and subpopulation complexity of the patient's leukemia after xenotransplantation, we comprehensively immunophenotyped diagnostic B-ALL from children and their matched PDX using identical, clinically standardized flow protocols and instrument settings. This cross-standardized approach ensured longitudinal stability and cross-platform comparability of marker expression intensity at high phenotyping depth. This analysis revealed readily detectable changes to the patient leukemia-associated immunophenotype (LAIP) after xenotransplantation. To further investigate the mechanism underlying these complex immunophenotypic shifts, we applied an integrated analytical approach that combined clinical phenotyping depth and high analytical sensitivity with unbiased high-dimensional algorithm-based analysis. This high-resolution analysis revealed that xenotransplantation achieves patient-specific propagation of phenotypically stable B-ALL subpopulations and that the immunophenotypic shifts observed at the level of bulk leukemia were consistent with changes in underlying subpopulation abundance. By incorporating the immunophenotypic complexity of leukemic populations, this novel cross-standardized analytical platform could greatly expand the utility of PDX for investigating ALL progression biology and assessing therapies directed at eliminating relapse-driving leukemic subpopulations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".