MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3170496763 · doi:10.1101/2021.06.03.21258317

Prevalence of long-term effects in individuals diagnosed with COVID-19: an updated living systematic review

2021· preprint· en· W3170496763 on OpenAlexafffund
Francesca Reyes Domingo, Lisa Waddell, Angela M. Cheung, Curtis Cooper, Veronica J. Belcourt, Alexandra M.E. Zuckermann, Tricia Corrin, Rukshanda Ahmad, Laura Boland, Claudie Laprise, Leanne Idzerda, Anam Khan, Kate Morissette, Alejandra Jaramillo Garcia

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLong-Term Effects of COVID-19
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityUniversity of OttawaUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of TorontoOttawa HospitalPublic Health Agency of Canada
FundersHealth CanadaUniversity of TorontoPublic Health AgencyPublic Health Agency of Canada
KeywordsObservational studyMEDLINEMedicineSystematic reviewCochrane LibraryCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Meta-analysisQuality of life (healthcare)Grey literaturePediatricsFamily medicineInternal medicineDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Objective Post COVID-19 condition refers to persisting or recurring symptoms weeks after acute COVID-19 illness which can significantly impact quality of life and health systems. It is important to understand the manifestation and magnitude of this condition. The objective of this living systematic review is to summarize the prevalence of symptoms and sequelae reported by people ≥4 weeks after COVID-19 diagnosis. Design Systematic review, meta-analysis and narrative synthesis. Data sources Embase, Medline, PsychInfo, Cochrane Central and select grey literature up to April 14, 2021. Methods We adapted a previous search strategy used by the U.K. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence and updated it to search for new literature. Two reviewers screened references independently; one extracted data and assessed risk of bias and certainty of the evidence while another verified them. Prevalence data from laboratory-confirmed populations were meta-analyzed using a random effects model and synthesized separately in the short-term (4-12 weeks) and long-term (>12 weeks) periods after diagnosis. Data from clinically-diagnosed populations were synthesized narratively. Results Of the 4444 unique citations, 84 observational studies met our inclusion criteria. Over 100 post COVID-19 symptoms and sequelae were reported. Sixty-one percent (95% CI: 44-76%, low certainty ) and 53% (95% CI: 41-65%, low certainty ) of laboratory-confirmed individuals reported persistence or presence of one or more symptoms in the short- and long-term periods, respectively. The most prevalent symptoms in both periods included: fatigue, general pain or discomfort, shortness of breath, cognitive impairment and mental health symptoms. Conclusions A substantial proportion of individuals reported a variety of symptoms ≥4 weeks after COVID-19 diagnosis. Due to gaps in the research base, and the low certainty of the evidence currently available, further research is needed to determine the true burden of post COVID-19 condition in the general population and in specific subgroups. PROSPERO registration number CRD42021231476.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.031
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.054
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.031
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations67
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxivSame topicLong-Term Effects of COVID-19French-language works237,207