Synthesis of Analogs of a Potential Drug for Treatment of Epilepsy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Prior work in the Durst group had generated more than forty analogs of the potent anticonvulsant isoxylitone isolated isolated from a medicinal plant Delphinium denudatum Wall. The nitrile designated as TD532 was the most potent compound generated by A. Saikaley. The starting material for the synthesis of TD532 is isophorone. The observation that TD532 showed considerable potential as an anticonvulsant suggested that other cyclohexenones might have have similar activity. During this project close to fifty derivatives of cyclohex-2-enone, focusing mainly on 3-arylcylohex-2-enones, were prepared. The synthesis of these compounds is described and structure activity relationships are discussed. Based on all the available structure activity data, we have designated the indicated portion of structure A as the pharmacophore for anticonvulsant and anti-epileptic activity. The ester designated as TD561 (compound 40) showed excellent potential in both in vitro and in vivo assays. It has been shown to be a pro-drug of the corresponding acid TD562 (compound 48). These two compounds and the sodium salt of TD562 are currently undergoing final pre-clinical studies at the Center for Drug Research and Development in Vancouver. Five analogs, including TD561 are also under investigation by the Epilepsy and Seizure Division of the US National Institutes of Health.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".