Vasodilatation by carbon dioxide and sodium nitroglycerin reduces compliance of the cerebral arteries in humans
Bibliographic record
Abstract
New Findings What is the central question of this study? Vascular compliance importantly contributes to the regulation of cerebral perfusion and complex mechanisms are known to influence compliance of a vascular bed: while vasodilatation mediates changes in vascular resistance, does it also affect compliance, particularly in the cerebral vasculature? What is the main finding and its importance? Cerebral vasodilatation, elicited by hypercapnia and sodium nitroglycerin administration, reduced cerebrovascular compliance by approximately 26% from baseline. This study provides new insight into mechanisms mediating cerebrovascular compliance. Abstract Changes in vascular resistance and vascular compliance contribute to the regulation of cerebral perfusion. While changes in vascular resistance are known to be mediated by vasodilatation, the mechanisms contributing to changes in vascular compliance are complex. In particular, whether vasodilatation affects compliance of the vasculature within the cranium remains unknown. Therefore, the present study examined the impact of two vasodilatation pathways on cerebrovascular compliance in humans. Fifteen young, healthy adults (26 ± 5 years, seven females) completed two protocols: (i) sublingual sodium nitroglycerin (SNG; 0.4 mg) and (ii) hypercapnia (5–6% carbon dioxide gas mixture for 4 min). Blood pressure waveforms (finger photoplethysmography) and middle cerebral artery blood velocity waveforms (transcranial Doppler ultrasound) were input into a modified Windkessel model and an index of cerebrovascular compliance (Ci) was calculated. During the SNG protocol, Ci decreased 24 ± 17% from baseline ((5.0 ± 2.3) × 10–4 cm s–1 mmHg–1) to minute 10 ((3.6 ± 1.2) × 10–4 cm s–1 mmHg–1; P = 0.009). During the hypercapnia protocol, Ci decreased 28 ± 9% from baseline ((4.4 ± 1.9) × 10–4 cm s–1 mmHg–1) to minute 4 ((3.1 ± 1.4) × 10–4 cm s–1 mmHg–1; P < 0.001). Cerebral vasodilatory stimuli induced by nitric oxide and carbon dioxide mechanisms reduced compliance of the cerebral vascular bed by approximately 26% from supine baseline values.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".