MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3170649529 · doi:10.1017/cjn.2021.94

A young woman with multiple acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency (MADD)

2021· article· en· W3170649529 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
H. Goebel, Debora Pehl, Werner Stenzel, Udo Schneider, Markus Schuelke

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMetabolism and Genetic Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWeaknessMedicineMuscle biopsyMuscle weaknessPediatricsInternal medicineProximal muscle weaknessEndocrinologyPathologyBiopsyAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 31-year-old female hairdresser whose parents were first degree cousins complained of episodic attacks of headache, vomiting, and dizziness for the past eight years after an uneventful childhood and adolescence. Four years ago, she developed progressive weakness, muscle pain and difficulties walking and lifting her arms that she could not work in her profession anymore. She lost hair, weight and became amenorrhoic. Finally, her muscle weakness required intensive care. Early on her CK was mildly elevated to 237 U/l (normal < 167), but later to 900 and 1800. By MRI, skeletal muscles showed minimal contrast enhancement. The clinically suspected diagnosis of myositis prompted repeated muscle biopsies, which disclosed non-specific myopathic changes, scattered necrotic muscle fibers without inflammation, protein aggregation, or vacuolation by light microscopy, but abnormally structured mitochondria with inclusions by electron microscopy, and treatment with steroids without any clinical improvement. A panel of 1131 mitochondrial genes revealed a homozygous mutation in the ETFDH gene. LEARNING OBJECTIVES This presentation will enable the learner to: 1. Discuss MADD as a mitochondrial and lipid storage disease 2. Recognize the myopathology of MADD

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques→Same topicMetabolism and Genetic Disorders→French-language works237,207→