Functional and Molecular Characterization of Skeletal Muscle‐Specific CARM1 Knockout Mice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Coactivator‐associated arginine methyltransferase 1 [CARM1, also known as protein arginine methyltransferase 4 (PRMT4)] catalyzes the methylation of arginine residues on target proteins. Skeletal muscle CARM1 appears to have important functions during myogenesis, as well as in response to exercise and during disuse‐induced phenotypic plasticity. However, a mechanistic understanding of the role(s) of CARM1 in skeletal muscle biology is lacking. In this study, we test the hypotheses that: 1) Skeletal muscle‐specific CARM1 knockout (mKO) animals will have reduced strength, endurance, and motor function compared to their wild‐type (WT) littermates, and 2) The acute intracellular and gene expression responses in skeletal muscle to a single bout of exercise will be altered in CARM1 mKO versus WT animals. To address our first hypothesis male 12‐week‐old mKO mice and WT littermates underwent a variety of functional tests. We found that mKO mice had significantly weaker maximum grip strength, increased fatigue, and slower ambulatory activity relative to their WT counterparts. Compared to WT mice, mKO animals had altered muscle mass depending on the tissue analysed. Immunofluorescence fiber type analysis revealed significant differences between male mKO and WT mice in the soleus (SOL) muscle. Male animals were then randomly assigned to one of three experimental groups: sedentary (SED), acute exercise (0AE), or acute exercise followed by 3 hours of recovery (3AE). CARM1 mKO animals ran for significantly less time and distance (~30%) than their WT counterparts. CARM1 mRNA levels remained constant across timepoints in WT animals in both the extensor digitorum longus (EDL) and SOL. EDL muscle from WT animals displayed significantly increased (737%) exercise‐induced PGC‐1α mRNA between SED and 3AE groups, while no increase was observed in mKO animals. PGC‐1α levels were similar between all experimental groups in both WT and mKO animals in the SOL muscle. Additionally, PRMT1, PRMT5, and PRMT7 transcript expression was also consistent across timepoints, genotypes, and muscles. We observed that CARM1 protein levels were similar between experimental groups in WT animals. WT and mKO animals displayed increased phosphorylated AMPK levels at 0AE when compared to SED. Total AMPK levels were consistent across all 3 experimental groups in both WT and mKO animals, while removal of CARM1 increased AMPK content. AMPK activation status was significantly elevated from SED to 0AE, with a return to basal levels at 3AE in both the WT and mKO animals. PGC‐1α protein content was not altered by exercise or by genotype and PRMT1, PRMT5, and PRMT7 levels were also similar between groups. In conclusion, this ongoing study demonstrates that the removal of CARM1 in skeletal muscle negatively impacts measures of muscle function, as well as alters the molecular response of skeletal muscle to acute physical activity. Altogether this study serves to increase our understanding of CARM1 and its role in regulating skeletal muscle plasticity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".