MO129COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF SGLT2I VERSUS DPP4I ON CARDIOVASCULAR AND RENAL OUTCOMES IN ROUTINE-CARE SETTINGS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background and Aims While clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of SGLT2 inhibitors on preventing cardiovascular and renal damage, few studies have expanded this evidence to routine-care settings. Method We compared clinical outcomes of adults who started SGLT2i or DPP4i therapy in Stockholm, Sweden, during 2013-2019. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular (CV) death and hospitalization for heart failure (HF). Secondary outcomes included major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE; composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke), all-cause mortality and the rate of eGFR decline (eGFR slope). Propensity score weighted Cox regression was used to balance 55 variables and estimate intention-to-treat hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals. Differences in eGFR slope were calculated with linear mixed models. Results We identified 7136 individuals starting SGLT2i and 13,618 starting DPP4i therapy. Median age was 64 years (37% women) and median eGFR 86 ml/min/1.73m2. During median follow-up of 2.1 years, 211 individuals developed the primary outcome, 269 experienced MACE and 178 died. After propensity score weighting, patients starting SGLT2i therapy were at lower risk for the composite of CV death/HF hospitalization (HR 0.71; 95% CI 0.53-0.94) compared with DPP4i, and showed a tendency towards lower MACE (0.84; 95% CI 0.67-1.04) and all-cause mortality (0.85; 95% CI 0.62-1.18). There were a median of 4 (interquartile range: 2-8) eGFR measurements during follow-up per patient to estimate their eGFR slopes. In adjusted models, new users of SGLT2i had a slower rate of kidney function decline compared with DPP4i (eGFR slope difference of 0.43 (95% CI 0.15-0.72) ml/min/1.73m2 per year). Results for the primary outcome were consistent across 7 pre-specified subgroups, including eGFR (eGFR ≥60: HR 0.79 [95% CI 0.57-1.08]; eGFR <60: HR 0.62 [0.38-0.99], p-value for interaction 0.40). Conclusion In patients undergoing routine care, initiation of SGLT2i was associated with fewer cardiovascular outcomes and less rapid kidney function decline compared with DPP4i initiation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".