Civic Sensibilities and Civil Rights in a Comparative Perspective: Demands of Respect, Considerateness and Recognition
Bibliographic record
Abstract
espanolEste articulo desarrolla el concepto de ‘sensibilidad civica’ para discutir la idea de la igualdad ciudadana partiendo del ejemplo de Brasil y comparandolo con Quebec. Refiriendose a las exigencias de respeto y consideracion o reconocimiento, el texto propone que la igualdad de los ciudadanos se encuentre siempre articulada por la relacion entre derechos, estatus y dignidad, configurando las sensibilidades civicas locales caracterizadas por un cierto sentido de trato digno, de modo que impida el deterioro de la dignidad del interlocutor. EnglishThis article develops the concept of civic sensibility to discuss the idea of citizen equality with a focus on Brazil, but looking at Quebec as a counterpoint. Referring to demands for respect and consideratness or recognition, the text proposes that citizen equality, wherever it takes place, is always modulated by the relation between rights, status and dignity, shaping local civic sensibilities, characterized by a certain sense of dignified treatment, which does not make the interlocutor inferior in his or her dignity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.039 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".