Saccades and pre-saccadic stimulus repetition alter cortical network topology and dynamics: evidence from EEG and graph theoretical analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Parietal and frontal cortex are involved in saccade generation, but their output signals also modify visual signals throughout cortex. These signals produce well-documented behavioral phenomena (saccades, saccadic suppression, various perisaccadic perceptual distortions) but their underlying influence on cortical network dynamics is not known. Here, we combined electroencephalography (EEG) with frequency-dependent source localization and graph theory analysis (GTA) to understand how saccades and pre-saccadic visual stimuli interactively alter cortical network dynamics in humans. 21 participants viewed series of 1-3 vertical or horizontal grids, followed by grid with the opposite orientation just before a horizontal saccade or continued fixation. EEG signals from the presaccadic interval (cue + 200ms, or equivalent fixation period) were used for source localization. Source localization (saccade – fixation) identified bilateral dorsomedial frontoparietal activity across frequency bands, whereas stimulus repetition produced band-specific modulations in left prefrontal, posterior parietal, and central-superior frontal and/or parietal cortex, with significant saccade-repetition interactions in frontal and parietal regions. GTA analysis revealed a saccade-specific functional network with major hubs in inferior parietal cortex (alpha) and the frontal eye fields (beta), and major saccade-repetition interactions in left prefrontal (theta) and supramarginal gyrus (gamma). Overall, quantitative measures of whole-brain network topology and dynamics (segregation, integration, synchronization, complexity) were enhanced during the presaccadic interval, but repetition interactions reduced synchronization and complexity. These results show that presaccadic signals have widespread, coherent influence on cortical network dynamics, likely responsible for both saccade production and the perceptual phenomena associated with saccades. Highlights Source localization & graph theory were used to analyze presaccadic EEG signals Presaccadic signals produced band-specific modulations/hubs in parietofrontal cortex Frontal/parietal eye fields showed extensive functional connectivity across all lobes Presaccadic stimulus repetition further modulated functional network connectivity Saccades and repetition both influenced network clustering, integration, & complexity
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".