MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Investigating the effect of temperature on large aggregate conversion of surfactant from ground squirrels

2013· article· en· W3170864359 on OpenAlexaffabout
Vanja Cvijanovic, Lynda McCaig, Jim Staples, Ruud A. W. Veldhuizen

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBat Biology and Ecology Studies
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityLawson Health Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHibernation (computing)Pulmonary surfactantAggregate (composite)PhospholipidChemistrySurface tensionEnvironmental scienceBiophysicsBiochemistryBiologyMaterials scienceThermodynamicsNanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During hibernation, ground squirrels’ body temperature is 5°C. Our research focuses on pulmonary surfactant during hibernation. Surfactant is a phospholipid‐rich material which regulates surface tension at the alveolar surface. A change in surface‐area during respiration leads to conversion of the large aggregate form of surfactant to the small aggregate form. Since temperature affects aggregate conversion, we tested the hypothesis that hibernation led to less conversion of large to small aggregates. Lungs of hibernating and summer active ground squirrels were lavaged to obtain large and small aggregates which were measured by a phospholipid‐phosphorous assay. Surface‐area cycling was performed at 37°C and 4°C to determine large aggregate conversion. Total amounts of large aggregate were higher in hibernating squirrels compared to summer active group. The large aggregates from all groups underwent a conversion to a greater extent at 37°C than at 4°C. Changes in large aggregate pool sizes occur during hibernation, in vitro aggregate conversion data suggests this may be as a result of reduced aggregate conversion at low temperatures. Funding: Canadian Institutes for Health Research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicBat Biology and Ecology Studies→French-language works237,207→