MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3170887561 · doi:10.1093/cdn/nzab050_015

Transcriptome Analysis Reveals Docosahexaenoic Acid and α-Linolenic Acid Affect Cholesterol Metabolism and Migration of Monocytes via Common and Distinct Gene Pathways

2021· article· en· W3170887561 on OpenAlexaff
Lisa Rodway, Samantha D. Pauls, Harold M. Aukema, Carla G. Taylor, Peter Zahradka

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Developments in Nutrition · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicFatty Acid Research and Health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDocosahexaenoic acidTranscriptomeBiologyBiochemistryCholesterolLipid metabolismMonocyteFatty acidMetabolismGene expressionGenePolyunsaturated fatty acidImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One of the earliest events in atherosclerotic plaque formation is the migration of monocytes to damaged blood vessels, and the accumulation of cholesterol in monocyte-derived macrophages. The omega-3 fatty acid docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) is known to inhibit this process. While there is limited evidence suggesting α-linolenic acid (ALA) has a similar effect, ALA has not been directly compared to DHA. The primary objective of this study was to compare the gene expression profiles of monocytes that have been exposed to either ALA or DHA and examine the effect of these fatty acids on monocyte cholesterol content and migration in a cell culture model. Transcriptome analysis was performed on total mRNA isolated from human THP-1 monocytes treated with ALA, DHA or vehicle for 48 h. Candidate genes identified via fold change and Ingenuity Pathway Analysis were validated by qPCR. Functional assays to measure total cholesterol content and migration were then performed on monocytes treated with ALA or DHA. Transcriptome analysis identified a series of genes associated with cholesterol metabolism and cell migration altered by ALA and DHA treatment. Changes in mRNA levels for candidate genes were validated by qPCR, with similar expression patterns as in the transcriptome analysis. Based on these data, both fatty acids were predicted to reduce cholesterol synthesis, ALA would increase migration and DHA would have no effect. Functional assays were then performed and revealed that ALA and DHA decreased cholesterol content to a similar extent. Additionally, contrary to our predictions, DHA significantly decreased migration, while ALA had no effect. The results suggest ALA and DHA may influence monocyte migration through distinct gene pathways, while cholesterol metabolism may be regulated by a common mechanism. Furthermore, only DHA treatment reduced monocyte migration in functional assays, while both fatty acids reduced cholesterol content. Due to the critical role of monocyte migration and cholesterol content in the pathophysiology of atherosclerosis, it may be concluded from this study that both DHA and ALA may exert protective effects involving different mechanisms as they relate to individuals at risk for cardiovascular disease. CIHR, NSERC

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Developments in Nutrition→Same topicFatty Acid Research and Health→French-language works237,207→