MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Significant increase in plasma osteocalcin in response to isoflurane induced anaesthesia in guinea pigs

2010· article· en· W3170902763 on OpenAlexafffund
Negar Tabatabaei, Celia Rodd, Richard Kremer, Hoper Weiler

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAnesthesia and Sedative Agents
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMontreal Children's HospitalSte. Anne's Hospital
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsIsofluraneMedicineAnesthesiaOsteocalcinPlasma concentrationEndocrinologyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The effect of the inhaled anaesthetic, isoflurane was studied on osteocalcin (OC) and total deoxypyridinoline (tDPD) in pigmented guinea pigs. Ten female guinea pigs were anaesthetized at five and nine weeks of age with isoflurane. The duration of anaesthesia was similar (20–25 min) in all guinea pigs across both age. Blood samples were collected at both time points, before and after the induction of the anaesthesia. Osteocalcin and tDPD were measured using ELISA (Quidel Corp.). Osteocalcin concentration increased due to isoflurane from 30.1±4.9 to 57.9±11.2 nmol/L (p<0.001) and from 29.1±7.5 to 62.9±15.9 nmol/L (p<0.001), at five and nine weeks of age, respectively. The effect of isoflurane on tDPD was inconsistent for the fifth and ninth week of age. Isoflurane increased tDPD (8.6±1.9 to 10.3±3.0 nmol/L) at five week of age while it decreased it (12.3±4.0 to 10.5±1.7 nmol/L) at nine week of age. The results demonstrate that administration of isoflurane changes both OC and tDPD. Therefore the interpretation of results obtained from animals anaesthetised by isoflurane on bone biomarkers should be made with caution since they may be highlighted or masked by the effect of the anaesthetic. Measurements prior to anaesthesia are recommended for better consistency and comparability in research. This study was funded by CIHR.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicAnesthesia and Sedative AgentsFrench-language works237,207