Investigación de óbitos en menores de un año.: En búsqueda de la integridad en la asistencia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
espanolEste trabajo tuvo como objetivo realizar las acciones de vigilancia ampliada de los obitos infantiles en ninos menores de un ano, utilizando el modelo Calgary de intervencion en la familia. Se trato de un estudio cualitativo, realizado en 2007, en el cual fueron observados los obitos infantiles que ocurrieron entre 2005 y 2007 en dos municipios del Estado de Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil, localizados en la region Norte y Sur del Estado. Fue abordado el ultimo obito ocurrido de cada municipio. Las dos familias investigadas tuvieron historico de repeticion de obito infantil, en un periodo de hasta dos anos. El modelo Calgary se mostro util al asistir familias en luto, proporcionando una mejor comprension de las estructuras y ajustes familiares, y como la familia retorna al equilibrio y re-estructura sus relaciones despues del obito del recien nacido. Ese modelo posibilita la ampliacion de la actuacion del enfermero, realizando junto con la investigacion del obito, el cuidado integral. EnglishFull time care can be recognized in health through that value care. The aim of this study was to develop a comprehensive surveillance care program to assist families with under one year old infant death cases using Calgary´s family intervention model. This is a convergent child weltare research done is the first semester of 2007. Infant death rates were tracked from 2005 to 2007 (1st semester) in three counties of Rio Grande do Sul State and the last two deaths occurring in each county were tocused on. In this article two familiars are referred to and are identified as families A and B. Family A had a history of two infant deaths in a two-year period. The death event in family B occurred in September 2006. The theoretical-methodological support was useful in assisting the families in mourning, providing us with a better understanding of the structures and family arrangements, as well as enabling a better understanding of how families regain their balance and restructure their relationships, thus broadening the nurse´s working field. Calgary´s model is a source of care and support for the mourning families, in addition to identifying causes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".