MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Implication of nuclear progesterone receptor on respiratory control in newborn mice.

2013· article· en· W3170932811 on OpenAlexafffund
Orlane Rossignol, Catherine Potvin, NagaPraveena Uppari, François Marcouiller, Aïda Bairam, Vincent Joseph

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsHypoxic ventilatory responseRespiratory systemApneaInternal medicinePeripheral chemoreceptorsEndocrinologyPlethysmographHypoxia (environmental)Control of respirationVentilation (architecture)ReceptorBiologyMedicineChemoreceptorChemistryOxygen

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We tested the hypothesis that nuclear progesterone receptors (PR) contribute to respiratory control development by studying newborn mice lacking PR expression (PRKO) or wild type controls (WT) at 1 and 4 postnatal days (P1 – P4). Minute ventilation was assessed under normoxia and in response to hypoxia (FiO2=14%, 12%, 10%, 20 min each) using whole body plethysmography. Hypoxic ventilatory response (HVR) was expressed as percentage changes from normoxia, apnea frequency was evaluated under normoxia. In P1 and P4 PRKO mice HVR was 2–3 times lower than in WT for the whole range of FiO2, during the early (peak response) and late (steady state) phase of HVR. In P1, the frequency of spontaneous apnea was lower in PRKO than in WT, while the frequency of post‐sigh apnea frequency was similar. In P4, the frequency of spontaneous and post‐sigh apnea was higher in PRKO than in WT. We conclude that the nuclear progesterone receptor plays a prominent role in respiratory regulation in newborn mice. Both phases of HVR (early and late) are disrupted in PRKO mice, likely indicating effects on peripheral chemoreceptors and central integration. Supported by CIHR.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research→French-language works237,207→