MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Congenital Craniofacial Abnormalities in Olive Ridley Sea Turtle Hatchlings

2021· article· en· W3171023309 on OpenAlexaff
Rodolfo Martin del Campo, Joy M. Richman

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicTurtle Biology and Conservation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsPremaxillaBiologyCraniofacialHatchlingHoloprosencephalyAnatomyTurtle (robot)SnoutMaxillaPregnancyFisheryHatchingEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Olive Ridley (Lepidochelys olivacea), is the most abundant species of sea turtles in the world, but is still threatened according to the red list of endangered species. Apparently, the Olive Ridley turtle seems more prone to congenital malformations compared to other species of sea turtles. In northwestern Mexico, an incidence of congenital malformations of 2% has been reported for this species, most of which occur in the craniofacial region (49%). The objective of this study was to deduce the etiology of the malformations based on the pattern of the affected structures. During the 2019 nesting season at El Caimanero nesting beach, Sinaloa, Mexico, 11 specimens with external craniofacial malformations and 10 that did not show external malformation were collected. The normal animals hatched, but died from other natural causes within the nests. Specimens were divided between histological analysis or µCT with phosphotungstic acid contrast enhancement. Specimens with malformations consistent with a Holoprosencephaly (HPE) phenotype were detected (Table 1). Analysis PTA staining and µCT showed there was a single external naris. There was variability in the morphology of the nasal passages. Other midline structures were also deficient including absent interorbital septum and small premaxilla. However, two other cardinal signs of severe HPE were not seen. The brain was divided into right and left hemispheres and the eyes were separated. There were additional defects in the mandible affecting mesodermal derivatives of the first arch. The tongue was severely hypoplastic and the musculature in the floor of the oral cavity was deficient. The tracheal opening was also displaced posteriorly in the tongue compared to the usual position in the center of the tongue. The nasal defects may be caused by a hypoplastic frontonasal process which allows merging of the nasal pits. The muscular deficiencies in the tongue are likely due to incomplete formation of lingual swellings in the first pharyngeal arch. Nasal development was normal in the majority of animals and the most common defect was mandibular deviation combined with hypoplasia. The defects observed are consistent with a mild form of HPE but also with ciliopathies that include tongue agenesis. Further histological analysis will be carried out to assess cellular and molecular phenotypes. This work suggest pleotropic environmental effects cause the embryonic defects after the eggs are oviposited in the nest. This turtle species lays eggs with embryos in the gastrula stage of development, reaching pharyngula stage, 3‐4 days after laying. Therefore, we postulate an exposure to an environmental teratogen in the first 4 days is responsible for the congenital abnormalities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicTurtle Biology and ConservationFrench-language works237,207