MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3171047904

한국 단편애니메이션 활성화를 위한 벤치마킹 - 캐나다 NFB 단편애니메이션 정책 보고논문 -

2015· article· ko· W3171047904 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
박기복

Bibliographic record

Venue일러스트레이션 포럼 · 2015
Typearticle
Languageko
FieldComputer Science
TopicEducational Systems and Policies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOriginal equipment manufacturerBusinessPolitical scienceComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OEM 산업구조에서 벗어나 창작 애니메이션 구조로 진입한 한국 애니메이션은 산업적 가치 창출을위해 선진 해외 사례 벤치마킹과 시장 확대, 유통구조 개선 등의 기반 마련을 하고 있으나 이와 함께단편애니 메이션의 문화적 토대 구축을 위한 노력도동시에 필요하다. 애니메이션은 산업적 특성과 교육, 예술적 속성의문화콘텐츠이기 때문에 한 국가의 애니메이션의 발전 은 산업적 부흥과 함께 문화적 토대구축을 위한이중 노력이 중요하다. 특히 단편애니메이션의 활성화 는 형식과 내용의 다양성 확보를 통하여 가능하다. 본 연구는 제작형식의 창의성과 다양한 내용을 제시한 캐나다 NFB(National Film Board of Canada)단 편애니메이션을 분석하여 벤치마킹 사례로 활용하는 것을 목적으로 한다. 캐나다 애니메이션은 캐나다 만의 문화적 기반을 바탕으로 발전해서 애니메이션의 산업적 토대까지 확장하였다. 이에 대한 캐나다 애니메이션 정책과 기술혁신의노력을 캐나다국립영상위원회 (NFB)중심으로 분석하 여 한국 단편애니메이션의 ‘다양성’에 대한 활성화를 제안 하고자 한다.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.933
Threshold uncertainty score0.133

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.014
Scholarly communication0.0070.009
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue일러스트레이션 포럼Same topicEducational Systems and PoliciesFrench-language works237,207