MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3171077293 · doi:10.1093/cdn/nzab041_035

Higher Protein Intake Does Not Augment Muscle Protein Synthetic Responses During the Early Stages of Resistance Training in Middle-Aged Adults

2021· article· en· W3171077293 on OpenAlexaff
Amadeo F. Salvador, Colleen F. McKenna, Kevin J.M. Paulussen, Alexander R. Keeble, Andrew T. Askow, Susannah E. Scaroni, Zhong Li, Alexander Ulanov, Scott A. Paluska, Daniel M. Moore, Nicholas A. Burd

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Developments in Nutrition · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMuscle metabolism and nutrition
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMyofibrilSkeletal muscleInternal medicineMedicineMuscle proteinEndocrinologyProtein biosynthesisResistance trainingAnimal scienceBiologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dietary protein intake augments muscle protein synthesis rates during acute recovery from resistance exercise training (RET) and can help offset age-related loss in muscle mass. Skeletal muscle tissue contains a variety of different protein pools such as myofibrillar (contractile), mitochondrial (substrate oxidation), and collagen (structural support) proteins that have been reported to have different contraction and nutrient sensitivities in controlled laboratory studies. However, no study has investigated the impact of dietary protein intake on the synthesis of these specific muscle proteins fractions during RET in a free-living setting. Therefore, we investigated the effect of dietary protein intake on daily muscle protein synthesis rates (PS) within the myofibrillar (MyoPS), mitochondrial (MitoPS), and collagen (CPS) protein fractions throughout the early phase (0 – 3 wks) of RET in middle-aged adults. Twenty middle-aged adults (47 ± 1 y, BMI 28 ± 1 kg/m2, M = 12, F = 8) were stratified and randomized to consume either moderate (MOD; 1.06 ± 0.22 g/kg/d) or high (HI; 1.55 ± 0.25 g/kg/d) amounts of protein during a dietary counseling-controlled resistance training program. On day 0, participants ingested intermittent boluses of deuterated (2H) water followed by daily maintenance doses throughout the study period. Muscle biopsies were collected prior to and at weeks 1, 2, and 3 of the intervention to assess MyoPS, MitoPS, and CPS by LC/MS. MitoPS decreased at 0–3 wks when compared to 0–1 wks (P = 0.010, CI: −0.77 – −0.10%/d) regardless of group (HI: 0.64 ± 0.32%/d and MOD 0.86 ± 0.55%/d; P = 0.827). A similar decline was also observed for CPS (group P = 0.323; time P = 0.007). The MyoPS in the HI condition remained constant (0–1 wk: 0.81 ± 0.42%/d and 0–3 wks: 0.81 ± 0.72%/d, P = 1.0), but MOD decreased over time (0–1 wk: 1.35 ± 0.9%/d and 0–3 wks: 0.77 ± 0.43%/d, P = 0.023). Our results demonstrated that additional protein intake above moderate amounts does not meaningfully potentiate the stimulation of longer-term muscle protein synthetic responses within the myofibrillar, mitochondrial, or collagen protein fractions during the early stages of a RET in middle-aged adults. Funded in part by the Beef Checkoff. AFS funded by CAPES Scholarship.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Developments in Nutrition→Same topicMuscle metabolism and nutrition→French-language works237,207→