MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3171123298

Buenas Prácticas Ganaderas en Establos Lecheros

2019· article· es· W3171123298 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
R Edwin Mizhquero, Mauro Guevara, Nohemi Carmen Jumbo Benítez, Paulina Fernández Guarnizo, María García S

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista del Colegio de Médicos Veterinarios del Estado Lara · 2019
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgricultural and Food Production Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesGeographyArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

espanolLa investigacion se llevo a cabo en los establos: San Isidro Labrador, ubicado en Herbay Alto - Canete, y el establo La Molina de la Unidad Experimental de Zootecnia (UEZ), pertenecientes a la Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina; para recolectar informacion se realizaron encuestas con 98 preguntas aplicadas por dos ocasiones; en agosto del 2016 y marzo del 2017. Para elaborar la encuesta se tomo como base la guia de Buenas practicas en explotaciones lecheras de la FAO-FIL; que permitio evaluar temas de sanidad animal, higiene en el ordeno, nutricion, bienestar animal, medio ambiente y gestion socioeconomica, actividades relacionadas con las buenas practicas ganaderas aplicadas en los establos. Los resultados obtenidos con relacion a la higiene del ordeno en la primera evaluacion fueron del 93.3% en ambos establos, al realizarse la segunda evaluacion el cumplimiento fue total con el 100% en los dos establos. Sin embargo, el aspecto relacionado con la nutricion fue el mas bajo en cuanto a cumplimiento con un 69.2% para el Establo San Isidro Labrador, y un 61.5% para el establo La Molina, valores obtenidos tanto en la primera como en la segunda evaluacion. En lo referente a bienestar animal, el establo San Isidro Labrador en la primera evaluacion presento un cumplimiento de 86.3%, en la segunda se evidencio una mejoria con un 95.4%, en caso del establo lechero La Molina en la primera evaluacion tuvo 90.9% de cumplimiento y en la segunda 95.4% de cumplimiento. La gestion socioeconomica tanto en la primera y segunda evaluacion en el establo San Isidro Labrador como en el establo La Molina se cumplieron en un 81.8%. Sobre sanidad animal en la primera evaluacion el establo San Isidro cumplio en un 71.4% y el establo La Molina 78.6%, en la segunda evaluacion el establo San Isidro Labrador y el establo La Molina presentaron un porcentaje de cumplimiento de 82.1%. Referente a medio ambiente en ambas evaluaciones realizadas al establo San Isidro Labrador y al establo La Molina presentan un 77.7% de cumplimiento. En la segunda evaluacion realizada a los establos se nota una mejora significativa en higiene del ordeno cumpliendose en un 100%. EnglishThe investigation was carried out in the stables: San Isidro Labrador, located in Herbay Alto - Canete, and the La Molina stable of the Experimental Animal Husbandry Unit (UEZ), belonging to the National Agrarian University La Molina; to collect information, surveys were conducted with 98 questions applied twice; in August 2016 and March 2017. In order to elaborate the survey, the guide of Good Practices in Dairy Farms of FAO-FIL was taken as a basis; which allowed evaluating animal health issues, milking hygiene, nutrition, animal welfare, environment and socio-economic management, activities related to good livestock practices applied in the stables. The results obtained in relation to milking hygiene in the first evaluation was of 93.3% in both stables, when the second evaluation was carried out, the total compliance was 100% in the two stables. However, the aspect related to nutrition was the lowest in terms of compliance with 69.2% for the San Isidro Labrador stable, and 61.5% for the La Molina stable, values obtained both in the first and in the second evaluation. Regarding animal welfare, the San Isidro Labrador stable in the first evaluation showed a compliance of 86.3%, in the second one an improvement was evidenced with 95.4%, in the case of the milk stable La Molina in the first evaluation had 90.9% compliance and in the second 95.4% compliance. Socioeconomic management in both the first and second evaluations in the San Isidro Labrador stable and in the La Molina stable were fulfilled in 81.8%. Regarding animal health in the first evaluation, the stable San Isidro complied with 71.4% and the stable La Molina 78.6%, in the second evaluation the stable San Isidro Labrador and the stable La Molina presented a compliance percentage of 82.1%. Regarding the environment, both evaluations carried out at the San Isidro Labrador stable and the La Molina stable presented a 77.7% compliance. In the second evaluation made to the stables, a significant improvement in milking hygiene is observed, which is complete in 100%. Key words:

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.798
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista del Colegio de Médicos Veterinarios del Estado LaraSame topicAgricultural and Food Production StudiesFrench-language works237,207