Privacy-Preserving Task Matching With Threshold Similarity Search via Vehicular Crowdsourcing
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In vehicular crowdsourcing, task requesters rely on a server to distribute spatial crowdsourcing tasks to on-road vehicular workers based on interests and locations. To protect the privacy of the interests and locations, both requesters and workers prefer to encrypt the information before uploading them to the server. However, such an encryption-before-outsourcing paradigm makes it a challenging issue to conduct the task matching. In this paper, we propose a Privacy-Preserving Task Matching (PPTM) with threshold similarity search via vehicular crowdsourcing. We first propose an interest-based PPTM by transforming vehicular workers' interests into binary vectors. By using Symmetric-key Threshold Predicate Encryption (STPE) and proxy re-encryption, PPTM achieves privacy-preserving multi-keyword task matching with Jaccard similarity search in multi-worker multi-requester setting. Furthermore, by comparing the Euclidean distances between workers and requesters against a pre-defined threshold, PPTM preserves the location privacy of workers and requesters that only reveals the comparison results to the crowdsourcing server. The security analysis and extensive experiments demonstrate that PPTM protects the confidentiality of locations and interests of requesters and workers while achieving the efficient task matching.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.021 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it