MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3171255729 · doi:10.1016/j.nutres.2021.05.007

Higher concentrations of vitamin D in Canadian children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis compared to healthy controls are associated with more frequent use of vitamin D supplements and season of birth

2021· article· en· W3171255729 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Sarah L. Finch, Alan Rosenberg, Anthony Kusalik, Farhad Maleki, Elham Rezaei, Adam Baxter‐Jones, Susanne M. Benseler, Gilles Boire, David A. Cabral, Sarah Campillo, Gaëlle Chédeville, Anne-Laure Chetaille, Paul Dancey, Ciarán M. Duffy, Karen Watanabe Duffy, Jaime Guzmán, Kristin Houghton, Adam M. Huber, Roman Juřenčák, Bianca Lang, R M Laxer, Kimberly Morishita, Kiem Oen, Ross E. Petty, Suzanne Ramsey, Johannes Roth, Rayfel Schneider, Rosie Scuccimarri, Elizabeth Stringer, Shirley M. L. Tse, Lori B. Tucker, Stuart E. Turvey, Michael Szafron, Susan J. Whiting, Rae S. M. Yeung, Hassan Vatanparast

Bibliographic record

VenueNutrition Research · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVitamin D Research Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaDalhousie UniversityCentre hospitalier universitaire de QuébecJaneway Children's Health and Rehabilitation CentreUniversity of Prince Edward IslandMcGill University Health CentreBC Children's HospitalUniversity of British ColumbiaIzaak Walton Killam Health CentreAlberta Children's HospitalUniversity of TorontoUniversité de SherbrookeChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioUniversity of CalgaryHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCanadian Arthritis NetworkChildren's Hospital Research Institute of ManitobaGigtforeningenArthritis SocietyUniversity of SaskatchewanMemorial University of NewfoundlandUniversity of British Columbia
KeywordsMedicineVitamin D and neurologyvitamin D deficiencyVitaminArthritisInternal medicineJuvenileCohortSeason of birthPhysiologyEndocrinologyPediatricsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.358
Threshold uncertainty score0.942

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2021
Admission routes3
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueNutrition ResearchSame topicVitamin D Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207