Empirical support for a strategy for the restoration of Pugnose Shiner (<i>Notropis anogenus</i>)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Over much of its range, Pugnose Shiner (Notropis anogenus) populations are isolated and endangered. This study tested the feasibility of pond culturing Pugnose Shiner for restoration. In 2015, 65 wild broodstock from Sodus Bay, New York State's last remaining Lake Ontario population, were stocked into a 0.2ha aquaculture pond. Thousands of juveniles were quickly produced, and during 2016–2017, 7,400 pond‐reared Pugnose Shiner were stocked into Chaumont Bay, Lake Ontario. Poststocking surveys in 2020 demonstrated the establishment of 4‐year classes in Chaumont Bay from natural reproduction. Following the successful establishment of Pugnose Shiner in Chaumont Bay, the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation recommended the downlisting of the Pugnose Shiner from Endangered to Special Concern. The restoration strategy described here is applicable to other sites in the United States and Canada, where this species is also of conservation concern.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".