The Effect of Oat β-Glucan on Postprandial Blood Glucose and Insulin Responses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The efficacy of oat beta-glucan (OBG), a viscous soluble fibre, on postprandial glycemic outcomes may depend on the nature of the control and the dose and molecular weight (MW) utilized. We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis of acute clinical trials to determine whether these features mediate the glycemic and insulinaemic responses to OBG. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched through October 27, 2020. We included acute, single-meal feeding, controlled trials investigating the effect of OBG (concentrate or oat bran) added to a carbohydrate-containing meal compared to a comparable meal (matched control) or a different carbohydrate-containing meal (unmatched control). Two reviewers extracted the data and assessed the risk of bias and certainty of evidence (GRADE). The primary outcome was incremental area under the curve (iAUC) for blood glucose. Data were pooled using the generic-inverse variance method with random effects model and expressed as ratio of means with [95% Cis]. One hundred and three trial comparisons (N = 538) were included. OBG reduced glucose iAUC and iPeak by 23% (0.77 [0.74, 0.81]) and 28% (0.72 [0.64, 0.76]) and insulin by 22% (0.78 [0.72, 0.85]) and 24% (0.76 [0.65, 0.88]), respectively. Dose, molecular-weight and comparator were significant effect modifiers of glucose iAUC and iPeak. Significant linear dose-response relationships were observed for all outcomes. OBG molecular-weight > 300 kg/mol significantly reduced glucose iAUC and iPeak, whereas, molecular-weight < 300 kg/mol did not. Reductions in glucose iAUC (27 vs 20%, p = 0.03) and iPeak (39 vs 25%, p < 0.01) were significantly larger with different vs comparable control-meals. Outcomes were similar in participants with and without diabetes. All outcomes had high certainty-of-evidence. Current evidence indicates that the addition of OBG to carbohydrate-containing meals reduces the postprandial glycemic and insulinaemic responses. However, the magnitude of glucose reduction depends on OBG dose, molecular-weight and the comparator. INQUIS Clinical Research Ltd. (formerly GI Labs), and PepsiCo Global R&D
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.015 | 0.030 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.024 | 0.035 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".