MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3171417956 · doi:10.1101/2021.06.02.446679

Live whole-eye, ex vivo imaging and laser-induced micro injury of the corneal basal epithelium and visualization of resident macrophage responses

2021· preprint· en· W3171417956 on OpenAlexaff
Sebastian M. D. Gulka, Ana M. Litke, Kerry R. Delaney, Robert L. Chow

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicConnexins and lens biology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEpitheliumCorneaCorneal epitheliumEx vivoCell biologyFluorescence microscopeConfocalBiologyPathologyIn vivoFluorescenceMedicineOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Purpose In this paper, we describe a novel live-imaging approach to visualize the short-term response of the mouse cornea to basal epithelial cell damage. Laser scanning confocal microscopy was used to induce precisely-defined, localized corneal basal epithelial cell damage and the live macrophage response to this damage was visualized and analyzed. Methods Lipophilic fluorescent dyes, SGC5 or FM 4-64, were injected into the anterior chamber of enucleated eyes and imaged live in whole-mount using confocal laser scanning microscopy. Laser-induced damage was performed by focusing onto a defined region of the corneal basal epithelium for a brief period using a high laser power setting and then returning to low laser power for imaging. Eyes from CX3CR1 +/GFP mice were used to observe macrophage responses to laser damage in real-time. Results SGC5 or FM 4-64 dyes injected into the anterior chamber readily enter the cornea and are taken up by the stromal layer and labeled the outer membranes of corneal epithelial cells and remained stable when visualized using low laser power. Subjecting a defined region of the basal epithelium to high laser power for 1 minute or longer led to a rapid internalization of dye in the exposed basal epithelium cells and overall increase in cellular fluorescence. This change in fluorescence was also accompanied by cell swelling and contraction. Cellular internalization of the non-lipophilic, dye Alexa 647 hydrazide, indicated that membranes were compromised indicating that exposure to high power laser stimulation causes cellular damage to the basal epithelium. Visualization of corneal resident macrophages close to the site of laser-induced damage showed that within minutes, projecting macrophage filopodia extended towards the damaged region at a rate of 0.75µm/min for roughly 40 minutes. Conclusion We have developed a novel approach to image the live cornea and its response to damage. Laser-scanning confocal microscopy can be utilized to induce localized damage to mouse corneal basal epithelium and elicit a macrophage morphological response. This approach represents a useful tool for studying corneal wound healing and cellular responses to damage using live whole-mount imaging.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicConnexins and lens biologyFrench-language works237,207