On the kinematics and timing of Rodinia breakup: a possible rift–transform junction of Cryogenian age at the southwest cape of Congo Craton (northwest Namibia)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract After tilt correction for Ediacaran thick-skinned folding, a pair of Cryogenian half grabens at the autochthonous southwest cape of Congo Craton (CC) in northwest Namibia restore to different orientations. Toekoms sub-basin trended east-northeast, parallel to Northern Zone (NZ) of Damara belt, and was bounded by a normal-sense growth fault (2 290 m throw) dipping 57° toward CC. Soutput sub-basin trended northwest, oblique to NZ and to north-northwest-trending Kaoko Belt. It was bounded by a growth fault (750 m down-dip throw) dipping steeply (~75°) toward CC. Soutput growth fault could be an oblique (splay) fault connecting a Cryogenian rift zone in NZ with a sinistral transform zone in Kaoko Belt. A transform origin for the Kaoko margin accords with its magma-poor abrupt shelf-to-basin change implying mechanical strength, unlike the magma-rich southern margin where a gradual shelf-to-basin change implies a mechanically weak extended margin. A rift−transform junction is kinematically compatible with observed north-northwest−south-southeast Cryogenian crustal stretching within CC. Post-rift subsidence of the CC carbonate platform varies strongly across the south-facing but not the west-facing shelf. A sheared western CC margin differs from existing Kaoko Belt models that posit orthogonal opening with hyper-extended continental crust. Carbonate-dominated sedimentation over southwest CC implies palaeolatitudes ≤35° between 770 and 600 Ma.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".